View Cart

Materials and Resources 1.3 – Building Reuse – Maintain 50% of Existing Non-Structural Elements

Please note that achievement of credits MR 1.1 and MR 1.2 are not required for achievement of credit MR 1.3.

Maintain 50% of Existing Non-Structural Elements

Intention:

  1. Extend the life cycle of existing building stock
  2. Conserve and retain cultural resources
  3. Reduce waste
  4. Reduce environmental impact with regards to manufacturing materials and their transport

Implementation:

  • Excludes:
    • MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing)
    • Elevator equipment
  • Includes:
    • walls, partitions, doors, ceilings, and floor covering
  • Calculation:
    • USE SQUARE FOOTAGE (sq.ft.)
  • Note:
    • fixed items are things like walls and doors found on-site count toward this credit IF they are used for the same purpose they were intentionally built for, i.e. a door is reused as a door.
    • if these items are reused for something else, i.e. a door becomes a table, they are NOT a part of this calculation

Codes/Standards Applied:

  1. none

Extra Credit:

  • none

Submittal Phase:

  • Construction (tip: all Materials and Resources credits are submitted in the construction phase except MR P1)

Links from Reference Guide:

  1. none

Other Materials & Resources Credits

BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Click here for the best Study Guides & Practice Exams

19 Comments On This Post

  1. Pat,
    Could you please answer this for me. I think the answer should be 10,000 sq.ft, but the answer is 20,000.
    You are renovating a 10,000 sq. ft. mill and will be re-using existing interior non-structural elements. Part of the design includes creating an addition to the building. What is the maximum size of the addition you can make and still achieve MR Credit 1.3, Building Reuse?
    Thanks

    Reply
  2. Hi Pat,
    I got it… it is 50% of the EXISTING. So 20,000 is the correct answer.
    Thanks!

    Reply
  3. Shanu,

    I think you misunderstood that. The maximum size of the addition is up to TWICE as the size of the building. If you are renovating 10,000sq.ft, so the max should be 20,000sq.ft.

    Reply
  4. I think the title of this credit is very misleading. It doesn’t matter if you save 50% of the existing building, because the calculation depends on the ENTIRE building (including any additions). Essentially, to achieve this credit the addition has to be really small or have a very open floor plan. Even when you count the surface area of both sides of the reused walls it doesn’t give you much to work with.

    Reply
  5. My question is: 50% of what? Is it 50% of the existing building or 50% of the new building? How does the square footage of surfaces that are reused relate to the square footage of the entire building?

    Reply
  6. The reference guide is really unclear about this. On the one hand it says “Compare retained/reused elements to the total completed area of interior elements” (comparing what you save to what you end up with) but on the other hand it says “Determine the percent of existing elements that are retained by dividing the total area (SF) of all retained interior non structural elements by the total area (SF) of interior non structural elements” which sounds like they’re talking about what was existing in the first place, not what’s there at construction completion. Is it my imagination or is the Reference Guide one of the most poorly written manuals in existence?

    Reply
  7. I agree with everyone, the MR 1.3 credit is completely unclear as it relates to additions that are 2x the size of the existing building. Does anyone know of a certified project with a large addition that met the requirements of 1.3? Please let me know if you do, I want to see how they did it.

    Reply
  8. On my practice test one of my questions is:
    For MRc1 which of the following aspects of a building project should NOT be included in the LEED calcualtions for submission? (Choose 3)

    According to my answers, 1 of the 3 correct answers is Small Additions to the Existing Building.

    So you don’t have to include additions (even assuming they aren’t more than 2x exiting bldg sf)in the calculations?

    Can anyone shed some light on this. I would think you would need to include additions as it changes the total square footage.

    Reply
  9. Hi Cassi,

    MRc1 Building Reuse is about Maintaining Existing walls,floors and roof. (Small) Additions are not to be included in the calculation because there’s nothing to maintain in the addition. It’s already new materials anyways. If the addition is more than 2 times the SF of the exis. bldg., this credit is not applicable. This doesn’t mean you consider the additions in the calculations. As long as the addition is less than 2 times of exis. bldg., you get to apply for the credit, and you calculate how much you maintain the existing building. This is what I think.

    Reply
  10. does furniture count as the non structural? or does this go into mrc3-7 only? thanks

    Reply
  11. sorry about the first post, i guess i was confused, but i got it figured out!

    Reply
  12. does this credit include windows? thnx

    Reply
  13. got it, this credit does include interior windows(as per ref. guide calcs). Pat I think you should add this to your list.

    Reply
  14. Question:
    If a project retains 95% of Exterior structure and 50% of interior non structural elements, does it mean that it is applicable for 3 points in total? MR1.1, MR 1.2 and MR 1.3?

    Reply
  15. That is correct!! It is valid for 3 points.

    Reply
  16. MR 1.3 states tha “it is not necessary to calculate the total area of existing interior non-structural elemnts prior to demolition.” (pg 251). What does that mean?

    Reply
  17. Ed, they want you to go back after the building has been completed and do a tally of all non-structural pieces. During this time you will be able to measure and quantify all existing parts, and the new parts. I hope this is right

    Reply
  18. MRc1 – Addendum.
    Totally confused by these statements in MRc1 Calculations for MRc1.3(maintain 50%of interior non-struct. elements).
    One statement is: “This credit is focused on reuse of interior non-struct. elements and compares the retained/reused elements to the TOTAL COMPLETED area of interior elements”. What do they mean by COMPLETED? To me, COMPLETED =retained/reused + new elements.
    Moreover, they add “It is NOT NECESSARY to calculate the total area of existing interior non-structural elements PRIOR TO DEMOLITION”. To me, that means, “don’t count what’s being demolished and tossed in the garbage”, which defeats the purpose of this credit.
    And yet, the Table 1 example uses the term “Existing area prior to construction” – that is, DO COUNT what’s being demolished..
    Is it me only who finds a contradiction in these statements?? Please shed some light…Exam in couple of weeks.

    Reply
  19. Let me re-phrase my question:

    Is it 50% of the completed elements, i.e. 50% of REUSED+NEW elements?

    -or-

    50% of the existing elements prior to demolition? i.e. 50% of DEMOLISHED and tossed+RETAINED elements of the original building?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Please refrain from posting any exam questions that are from the actual LEED exam or other sample exams. This jeopardizes the existence of the open comment format. Such comments will be deleted. Thank you for your understanding.

(required)
(requred)

Study Guides

My recommendations for the most helpful study guides and audio books that you can find for every LEED rating system.
Click for more info....

Study Guides

Practice Exams

There are tons of practice exams available to help you study for your LEED exam. Here are the BEST practice exams you can find that I’ve personally used and recommend to anyone.
Click for more info....

Practice Exams

Continuing Education (CE) Units

This 30 hour package includes everything you need to meet the GBCI Credential Maintenance requirements for LEED APs with Specialty.

Continuing Education (CE) Units

Classes

Find out where LEED exam prep classes are being held in your local area. Training courses will help you get through the exam process quickly and easily.
Click for more info....

Classes

About Me

About Me

Hi! My name is Pat and I’m the guy behind GreenExamAcademy.com. I graduated with a B.A. in Architecture from the University of California Berkeley, and was working in an Architecture firm for the last few years in Southern California...

MORE »

Thanks again for the great site, Pat! I passed the exam today with a 197. Your web site was a great resource.

-Chris

Read more Testimonials »